🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.